Talk:Anabast (5e Creature)

Quality Article Nomination

— This article became a quality article! 09:04, 17 January 2024 (MST))

I only moved the nomination here for now. Red Leg Leo (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2020 (MST)

All the numbers need checking, as straight away I saw the hit dice are incorrect. Marasmusine (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2020 (MST)

Has the changes since your comment fixed the issues? I know Sirsprinks has touched the page since then. I'm also wondering if RLL's comment has since been addressed so this nomination can have a determination.--Yanied (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2023 (MST)

Comment. I am scared of this. 200+ hp, flying, resistances out the wah-zoo. Regeneration, turn immunity, creatures get half hp back while near it, free DC 19 stun every turn & +13h dealing 45d. Oh yeah, legendary actions to do it again or simply make every lose every hit point they have (power word kill on steroids?). I don't think this is balanced for CR 12. a fighter goes down in 3-4 hits. Anyone under d10 HD quicker. You're only hope is fighting this in sunlight, and I am doubtful that happens. Cool picture, neat lore, unbalanced in my opinion.
Suggestion would be to remove some HD or tone down the regeneration, preferably the regen. I think the plus to hit might be a little to high, and most definitely the damage. The DC for the stun could be 16 I think as well. Not a creature expert, so hopefully others comment too. Red Leg Leo (talk) 13:15, 6 May 2020 (MDT)

Comment. The concept and flavor are nice and interesting than just a spooky shadow thing. I fixed the image but it needs a source. I agree that the numbers might need some look-overs. It shouldn't be far from a QA though.--Yanied (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2021 (MDT)

Hmm, is this image Public domain. It seems to be used in way too many places to trace.--Yanied (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2021 (MDT)

• Support. Thanks to balance passes since it's nomination, I believe this page certainly fits the bill for Quality Article. The modified Terminator quote gave me a good chuckle after watching the movie and coming back to this page. --SwankyPants (talk) 20:26, 30 October 2021 (MDT)

Support. It fits the bill for a quality article plus it actually has an image. Leíf (talk) 07:55, 1 November 2021 (MDT)

Support. It is good and has an image Leíf (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2021 (MDT)

But you already supported it yesterday? --SwankyPants (talk) 16:26, 2 November 2021 (MDT)

Thank you for pointing that out, I can not believe that I did not see it Leíf (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2021 (MDT)

Support. Cool nightmare from beyond. Undertuned in stats, makes up for it with annoying features and resistances. For a "Really high level mook" type of monster, it's fine. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vladulenta (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.

Support Well made, this gets my support. --Green Dragon (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2024 (MST)