User talk:Brostodes

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to D&D Wiki![edit]

Welcome!

Hello Brostodes, and welcome to D&D Wiki! I hope you are enjoying D&D Wiki and have been finding the information here useful. Before you start contributing, we recommend you make sure your user preferences match your preferences.

Questions

If you have any questions about a specific page please ask it on that page's talk page. If you have a D&D-related question, you can ask it on DnD Discussions. Everything relating to D&D Wiki's administration can be asked here. If you need to contact another user, please use their talk page.

Formatting

Syntax can be very difficult, and if you need help a good place to start is Help:Editing on Wikipedia (or even their Introduction page). This will explain basic wiki formatting and should provide quite a few useful links that explain more specific areas of wiki formatting. Help:Portal also provides detailed explanation of information important specifically to this community.

Community

A strong and welcoming community exists on D&D Wiki, and I'm sure you will find us friendly. To enable the community to function, a number of policies are in effect. Most importantly, we follow and expect you to follow Wikipedia's guidelines on civility and etiquette when discussing anything. As most work has multiple authors, please do not delete content without following our removal process. When posting a comment on a talk page, please ensure you sign your name with four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the signature icon (Signature icon.png). This will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you come to enjoy D&D Wiki and the community. Welcome again, you are now a D&D Wikian. --SirSprinkles (talk) 00:13, 18 January 2021 (MST)

Missing Identifiers[edit]

Hey, just popping in to ask you to keep on the (5e Equipment) identifier. Allows people to differentiate editions without clicking on individual paged and whatnot. --SwankyPants (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2021 (MST)

Cybertronian Feats[edit]

Hey, saw you've been making a bunch of these. Figured I'd try to communicate before taking any shots at them.

A good couple of them have objective downsides, which is very weird for feats. I assume this is to counteract the massive ASI bonus, but the +6 total could be altered a little. Either way, I get it's a lore thing, but it could at least use a Design Note before these pages get flagellated for lacking them. Goes for the feat chains too.

Also, since you seem to be the only other person who's taking interest in the page, might I ask your thoughts on my(year old, jeez) suggested rework. Feels a bit weird to instate with no feedback. --SwankyPants (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2021 (MST)

I'll get on that as soon as I figure out how to do that also rework of what? --Brostodes (talk) 20:37, 3 December 2021 (MST)

Oh, Shit Yeah Astartes has been put on indefinite back burner until the GW boycott is over or the passion returns to me, I'm more into Warhammer fantasy right now and other properties sorry but yeah if you wanna take a crack at fixing that mess go ahead --Brostodes (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2021 (MST)

I was referring to the one on the cybertronian talk page, meant to circumvent 5e's lack of anything but wagons and such for vehicles. The Warhammer drive kinda died on my end too, so that space marine race is probably gonna just stay unfinished until some other clueless shmuck who isn't aware of the whole deal comes along and does it in.
By the way, design note formatting is just {{Design Note|Like this}} , incase you haven't found out yet. --SwankyPants (talk) 21:28, 3 December 2021 (MST)

That rework would help alot cause I'm trying to run a game with this but no distinction on the vics size or power everyone just opted to be a seeker--Brostodes (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2021 (MST)

Alright, rework on the cybertronian page is dealt with, and I rooted through most of the feats, mainly just wording, except for the Advanced Alternate Form. A couple things.
I'm yet to touch on the Deployer feats, but I doubt they'll be of any real concern. --SwankyPants (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2021 (MST)
Shit mate good work on it I think I’ll work on the pretender and other two also the deployers just give you access to a lot of familiars main balancing feature they have to be medium and all count as construct also I’m going try again at getting hive leech separated from the redirect of destroyer hive sorry mate but the spell just doesn’t jive with my intent and the way lavie went about it ticked me off no civility just brute change without care or consideration like manners meant nothing again sorry but I will not stand for that sort of behavior in our community I pride myself in knowing that even if we disagree we still follow some manner of respect but I shan’t take shite from that individual, reminds me too much of the inquisition my dear friend yours truly --Brostodes (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2021 (MST)
Home of user-generated,
homebrew pages!


Advertisements: