Talk:Wolfkin (4e Race)

Blanked?

Why was this article cleared of all content?--Ganteka 10:48, 26 February 2009 (MST)

Delete

I did not see anything on this before but i tried to "fluff" it up.. I have more ideas if the admins and others don't mind me personally adding more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.83.134.65 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 5 January 2010 (MST). Please sign your posts.

Yes, please feel free. This article needs help. --Green Dragon 04:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Does anyone mind?

Does anyone mind if I work on this race? --Axl 03:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

If anyone could review this race, that would be great. The power that I put down is the red one. Note: I am not the creator of this race. I've just worked on it. --Axl 20:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't know 4e well enough to comment on balance/power, but the racial power you added is confusing to me. Your "hit" line doesn't actually tell you what kind of damage to deal, is that normal? Did you just update the format of the other power? If so, delete the old one. You should check out another 4e race and bring this up to that standard. Take, for instance, this one. I'm not saying you need that many pictures and other stuff, but at the very least you should add links throughout the page. --Badger 20:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I changed the power that I did. But I'll look at the Elf, Variant. --Axl 21:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Why do I need links throughout the page?

And yes, I just updated it and made it a little less confusing. And the reason why the hit line didn't really say anything, was because it was explained in the effects section. Recently, I just changed it to a... actually, I'll change the power that I did. Thanks. --Axl 21:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Links throughout the page help users click though the wiki better, and help build a more connected wiki. I'm not saying you have to link everything that has a page, but the classes could be linked, as well as abilities and skills. I find it makes the page much more useful. --Badger 22:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay. --Axl 18:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Good news!

Good news! The Wolfkin race is almost finished! Now alls that it needs is a subtype and we're all good! Help would be appreciated! --Axl 16:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Forgive my lack of knowledge about 4e, but from what I can tell, nothing in the monster manual or player's hand book as a subtype. Is subtype still a term used in 4e? It seems there are 5 types, and then some monsters (seemingly randomly, or as needed) have "keywords" associated with them. I don't know that this race needs anything beyond "humanoid". --Badger 21:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. I don't know if they have a subtype. I don't think they do. Do they even say that they have a type? I don't remember. It's been a while.

--Axl 23:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I changed the subtype anyway. It'll get rid of part of the template. --Axl 02:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

HA HA! Done! --Axl 01:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I've fixed it. 4e creatures have an origin and type. "Subtype" is a misleading holdover from 3rd edition. Marasmusine 07:22, 11 January 2012 (MST)

Image

The source image is under copyright. Do we have permission to use it? Marasmusine 04:23, 15 February 2012 (MST)

Fluff

I'm changing the fluff a bit. I'm not an evolution denier IRL, but in most fantasy settings (including the default D&D setting), humans have been created rather than evolved from apes. Marasmusine 03:39, 15 March 2012 (MDT)