Talk:Anthousai (5e Race)

I might give it Innate Spellcasting: Druidcraft cantrip at lvl 1 Entangle at lvl 3 Cha as spellcasting ability MoDuckyMo (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2020 (MDT)

That's a good idea for a buff.--Yanied (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2020 (MDT)

I don't understand what isn't in balance about this page, if anyone could help fix it that'd be great. Also as far as I can see, the grammatical errors have been fixed so why does the grammar warning keep appearing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.228.227.234 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.

The relevant content is described in the grammar template. Please read and understand it before attempting to remove it. --Nuke The Earth (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2021 (MST)

Okay but I've gone through the page a million times now, and the race name isn't capitalized at all unless it begins a sentence, so what is the issue? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.228.227.234 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.

If that is the case, then the relevant template may be removed. The issue is likely that you removed both templates - the one referencing creature types has not been addressed. Please ensure that you only remove templates that have been thoroughly addressed, and please remember to add a short explanation of your edit in the Summary tab at the bottom of the text editor. --Nuke The Earth (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2021 (MST)

Hi there, well I did ask previously about the imbalance on this page and how to fix it in this discussion page. So I’m not really sure what’s not balanced about this page and I’d appreciate it if someone were to help balance it. I absolutely love this race and am very passionate about it and am just very scared it will get deleted because someone offered it up for deletion yesterday and I feel that was unjust. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:387:5:807::a5 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.

With all due respect, that's entirely incorrect - according to the page history, it has never once had a deletion template on it. It has had several balance templates, a wording template or two, and an unattributed image template, but it has never once had a deletion template. This information is readily available to all wiki users, and I'm not sure why you would state otherwise. --Nuke The Earth (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2021 (MST)

Well actually I just looked and easily found exactly where the page was put up for deletion. 08:28, 3 February 2021‎ Vladulenta and 08:28, 3 February 2021 diff hist +78‎ File:Anthousai.jpg ‎ (current). So I am not just stating things, I literally saw it and you can go fact check me in the history because it is right there. So yes it has had a deletion template on it before, and at the time I posted that comment it did still exist.

You mean[1] this version? The one with no deletion template? --SwankyPants (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2021 (MST)

This version. https://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/File:Anthousai.jpg

That is the image file included on the page that is marked for deletion because it is unattributed, and almost certainly violates copyright laws. Because of that, it has been marked for deletion to avoid complications. An image file's deletion will not affect the state of this page in any way, save for the image not being included on this page. --Ref3rence (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2021 (MST)

Oh okay, thank you for clearing that up. I was under the impression that it meant the whole page since it said "page deletion". I'm very sorry for the confusion, I'm new to all of this and was only getting frustrated because I thought no one was believing me when I was sure I saw deletion. Now I understand, thank you again and I'm sorry if anything I said came off badly, I just did not want the page to be deleted.

No worries, I'm glad I could help. --Ref3rence (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2021 (MST)