D&D Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Dmilewski

Dmilewski

Dmilewski's Nomination. Failed.

---

Voice your opinion (0/3/3) 0% Approval; Ended 09:02, 16 August 2014 (MDT)

Dmilewski has not made edits here in 3 years now, so I do not think it is useful to keep him listed as an admin. Marasmusine (talk) 04:46, 18 June 2013 (MDT)

I did not see this page hiding here (no links). It will now proceed as it should have before. --Green Dragon (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2014 (MDT)

---

Discussion

Support

Oppose

• Per above. --Green Dragon (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2014 (MDT)
• Nothing against Dmilewski; Having an inactive account with administrative powers is a security concern, and therefore I think the power should be stripped for the time being. Jwguy (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2014 (MDT)
• I know I haven't been the most active lately (yay military requirements) but three years is a bit much. Tivanir (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2014 (MDT)

Neutral

Comments

• Jwguy has a valid point. That being said there are more current admins that haven't edited in 1 year+. If such is held a measure for Dmilewski, then it would be only fair to establish a term of inacticity guideline for admins and apply it hereafter. Whether it be three years, or some other length. Elohim (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2014 (MDT)

• In response to the comments about adminship activity, it is around 6 months if things are kept up to date as is mentioned elsewhere. Of course "bureaucrats are the final arbiters", who respond the RfA. --Green Dragon (talk) 11:08, 14 August 2014 (MDT)

• I've grown concerned regarding some edits I've recently found by Dmilewski, such as his edits to Greater Status and Community Domain. I'm still researching the legitimacy of his claims that the former is OGL and that the latter is justified, at all (I read my copy of Deities and Demigods and found no changes to the SRD Community Domain, and even if I had, the book is not released as OGL. Furthermore, Wizards' official SRD states the original Community Domain with no changes). Jwguy (talk) 20:37, 14 August 2014 (MDT)
  • Did you reference this to the errata? I don't know if they still have errata on their website :S but I know that they made errata for all the publications which demanded it. --Green Dragon (talk) 14:54, 16 August 2014 (MDT)