User talk:Zap284
Interwiki Linking[edit]
Hello Zap. You'll notice in this diff that I changed your page to interwiki links. This was reverted back by you so I won't continue, but it is common practice to use interwiki links instead of full url links here on the wiki. If you have any confusion with this, just ask and we can teach you how to do that. I've also noted that many of the items you file under your contributions on your page were created by other users. Are these former accounts of yours? If so, it is best to stick to one account. Unless of course you mean that you have only put pictures on said articles, which may be what you are implying. Hooper talk contribs email 18:48, 19 December 2009 (MST)
my bad[edit]
sorry. i thought it was an automatic thing or something... and yes, i only added pictures to those articles, also edited some. but if its not appropriate for me to put what articles ive pictured under my contributions then i understand completely. feel free to change anything you like so its more... up to date. lol... i would do it myself but i dont know how. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zap284 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.
- Oh no thats absolutely fine. Using interwiki links would just be better. I'll go ahead and do it for you on your page on the current ones and I'll leave the "pictured" and similar comments. In the future, instead of posting the same url, just put the page title in between two brackets, like so: [[PAGE NAME HERE]]. Also, remember to sign your talk page posts by using four tildes, like so: ~~~~. Hooper talk contribs email 20:59, 19 December 2009 (MST)
Monk gear[edit]
I created some magic monk attire and a weapon if you are interested. They are listed on my page. -- Irykyl 10:29, 19 March 2012 (MDT)
K[edit]
ill check it out ;) ~zap284
Talk:Zuan Codex (3.5e Sourcebook)/Priest[edit]
Hiya, apologies for stepping on toes in deleting the page in question. A long untouched and empty talk page appears to me as serving no purpose other than misleading people into thinking discussion exists about the article. If you want me to restore the page, with history 'n all, I can happily do so. Thanks~ --SgtLion (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2014 (MDT)