Talk:Zephyrium Ore (3.5e Equipment)

Spelling

Did a quick spell check for you, hope you don't mind. :) --Calidore Chase

Balance

This seems slightly overpowered for the price. I think a drawback might help. For example, the ammunition or armor is naturally weaker, though lighter (due to the inclusion of Zephyr), so:

1. Ammunition: Range Increment x 1.5 and damage -1 (except against earth creatures).
2. Armor: CoP: Earth against earth creatures, armor weight reduced by 80%, and armor check penalty reduced by one (equipment bonus), but provides one less point of armor bonus to AC. Ideas?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by EldritchNumen (talk • contribs) 19:40, 6 December 2006 (MST). Please sign your posts.

I like that idea, sure go ahead and implement it. Right now it does seem overpowered; and as this is a stub it needs to be changed. --Green Dragon 18:55, 6 December 2006 (MST)

Version 2.0

I like it much more, I think it serves a much greater purpose. This is much more like many SRD items, such as Mithral. Good job. --Green Dragon 21:05, 11 December 2006 (MST)

I like the rewrite and expanding. Looks great. --Dmilewski 09:54, 8 January 2007 (MST)

I must say, it looks better. Good job. --Green Dragon 16:15, 8 January 2007 (MST)

It still is strictly better than a +1 weapon. Perhaps that should have a drawback? I like it regardless :). Aarnott 06:18, 16 February 2007 (MST)

I like it too! :) Someone else originally made the page, but then abandoned it (and the page royally sucked), so I took it and made it better. So, for the meat of the conversation, how is using this ore better than a +1 weapon? I'm just curious about your justification (I don't mean that negatively or in an attacking way, I'm just curious about your line of reasoning). --EldritchNumen 14:58, 16 February 2007 (MST)

It is strictly better because....... I didn't read it properly :P. Oops! On proper reading it looks pretty fair. Aarnott 22:32, 18 February 2007 (MST)