Talk:Time Bomb (5e Spell)

This is basically fireball except better because force damage isn't as widely resisted as fire damage. SirSprinkles (talk) 01:06, 29 July 2017 (MDT)

I agree with SirSprinkles. This spell should be nerfed or altered in some way, considering mechanically it is just a better version of the definitive best 3rd level damaging spell. Even the DMG suggests not to use fireball as a guideline when making spells. Just dropping the damage to 7d6 would suffice, I think. - Guy (talk) 00:38, 30 July 2017 (MDT)

The Name

Maybe it's just me, but I find the name of the spell to be rather misleading. When I hear "time bomb", I think of, you know, a bomb with a delay or some kind of timer, not something that instantly explodes. 2602:306:3317:2900:4CD4:DB8D:4626:4E79 01:25, 29 July 2017 (MDT)

it's all good, I was trying to post all the spells and change them as I went from the page chronomancer and because of that I was starting to go too fastly and missed a chance to change them up Xo) had the idea in head already thought it was jotted down rather then it was --Bigdad881 (talk) 18:03, 29 July 2017 (MDT)

I agree with anonymous. "Chronoblast" or "Chron Bomb" or "Spacetime Bomb" maybe? - Guy (talk) 00:38, 30 July 2017 (MDT)