Talk:Scavenger (5e Background)

What is the difference between the scavenger and the scrounger backgrounds? --209.97.85.48 18:41, 1 June 2016 (MDT)

Quality Article Nomination

— This article did not become a quality article. Yanied (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2021 (MDT)
Please feel free to re-nominate it once it meets the QA criteria and when all the major issues brought up in this nomination have been dealt with.

Support. The difficulty of making savaged items descriptive, and also how the character approach the items from their background are well done. The fluff is engaging, and it all fits together well. --Green Dragon (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2020 (MST)

Support. It is a good concept, sort of like a klepto version of the outlander maybe. I am not 100% on board with the feature, as I think it should be associated with utility in food or improvisation rather than just worth and selling, but it does make sense even in this state.--Yanied (talk) 11:06, 5 October 2020 (MDT)

Oppose — First off, I don't believe the tool proficiencies make much sense, as you were not trained, so two languages probably fit better. Besides that, the kinds of characters you can make are a bit limited. The lore and background feature implies that you are a scavenger of bodies/battlefields, and doesn't leave too much room for interpretation for other types of scavengers(food, tool improvisation, ruin scavenger, ect.). Given that quality articles are supposed to be a bit broad and suitable for most campaigns, I don't believe this background is suited to being a quality article in its current state.--Blobby383b (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2021 (MDT)