Talk:Omniarcanist of Caladon (3.5e Prestige Class)

From D&D Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Epic Section[edit]

Discussion moved from User talk:Green Dragon#Prestige Classes Epic Section. --Green Dragon 14:17, 13 October 2009 (MDT).

Epic starts at level 20, even for prestige classes. --Green Dragon 18:22, 4 April 2009 (MDT)

I have a simple question about your statement on Omniarcanist of Caladon. What do you mean by the statement, "Epic begins at Level 20 even for prestige classes?" I understand that it is required for a character to be of at least 21st Level to be considered Epic; however, I do not understand your comment on the PrC itself. If it is connected to my formatting (which needs some modification that I would be happy to adhere to if you would give further information), I would love to know. I assumed (possibly incorrectly) that most players would be aware that Level 11 of the PrC is not a viable option until Character Level 21. Furthermore, what could I do to make the PrC more acceptably written? Regards, TTK —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tiassale Kamal (talkcontribs) 22:04, 12 October 2009 (MDT). Please sign your posts.
I meant that the epic section, although, right, one starts at level 21, should be a standard epic PrC section and only be 10 level longs (11-20). If I am reading it right it repeats after 20 anyway. Also the "entry requirements" should use the preload's table, the headers in the class features should be changed to bolded anc's (with the sub-information italicized), and a few links should be added. Just the names in the epic table need to be changed. --Green Dragon 14:17, 13 October 2009 (MDT)


== Rating == 18

Power - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because though the powers and secrets are great, spell focus (and its improvements) are typically (save for variant modification) weak feat selections. --Tiassale Kamal 12:13, 28 September 2010 (MDT)

Wording - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it is well-worded. --Tiassale Kamal 12:13, 28 September 2010 (MDT)

Formatting - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because everything is explained to me in the proper layout standards of Wizards of the Coast. I can easily create one of these in mere moments. --Tiassale Kamal 12:13, 28 September 2010 (MDT)

Flavor - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the flavour of the class is very desirable; my problem, however, is that you have restricted (without letting us know that it's okay) this class to your modified world of the Dragonlance setting. --Tiassale Kamal 12:13, 28 September 2010 (MDT)