Talk:Gypsy (3.5e Class)

From D&D Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Malicious edit[edit]

reverted from bad edit back to original. Zap284 (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2013 (MST)

Save VS. Death?[edit]

Did we go back to second ed? :P --Name Violation 17:12, 3 November 2009 (MST)

Death as in zero hp or -10 hp? --Jay Freedman 17:21, 3 November 2009 (MST)
Did we - Nevermind, stupid question. Anyway, Death as in "The monsters dead." When used versus a player character, I would imagine it'd be left up to the DM. --Avlindrel FallenTree 20:10, 3 November 2009 (MST)


I give this class a 4.5 out of 5, because it looks like it would work out well in a campaign. Some little hints would be to add somesort of future sense. Like palm reading or tarot card readings. As a skill, or just as some freaky feat. Either way, I like it. - Logenasty

Missing Column[edit]

Erm, there's some data missing in the 9th-level spells column. If I get around to it, I'll see about fixing it. -- Danzig 20:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

As a Feat[edit]

-- I am a little hesitant to make this it's own class, but I do think a feat that would be nice would be something like such: Romani: +2 to Perform and Handle Animal. This would allow the skills to be used untrained.

This would represent a life style the Romani people and their flavor. Just something you might want to add or use as an alternative. -- Ledeas Oakenbough


Balance - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because <<<While it does seem on the strong side of things, it's not insanely more stronger than what a beguiler into assasin could achieve. I see it as a rather strong class, but not gamebreaking, the spell list might need some more limitations though.>>> -- 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)

Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because <<<The wordings were rather clear, but there were a few problems. E.g. it says about having a bonus that applies whlie being flat-footed, but not while being denied dex, this should be clarified.>>> -- 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because <<<Seemed very much in touch with standard formatting.>>> -- 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because <<>> -- 09:43, 1 July 2013 (MDT)

Home of user-generated,
homebrew pages!