Talk:Gunslinger, Intellect (5e Class)

--DominusTempus3 (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2018 (MDT)A gunslinger similar to bards become stronger through knowledge, its up to DM to consider what is allowable for the Gunslinger.

All the grammar issues have been corrected, along with tags to other items within the Wiki.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DominusTempus3 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts.

I see class names that are capitalized, other capitalization errors(proficiency bonus, creatures(fire elemental), modifier, Dexterity, 1d8, and many others), and the links added are either dead or link to redirect pages.--Blobby383b (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2018 (MDT)

As usually everyone has a opinion. Not everyone thinks in a box. I don't create the links to pages, these were there at one time. Nothing is suppose to be perfectly balanced, as a Gunslinger augments itself to be better.--DominusTempus3 (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2018 (MDT)

I'm sorry if you feel that we're stifling your creativity, but on this wiki we have a general consensus that we should be enforcing balance, as that helps make sure everyone at the table is having fun rather than just the one person using a piece of content. If you wish for this page to be kept, you need to either bring it to a power level comparable to first-party content, or move the page into your userspace, where other users are not allowed to edit, except for administrators to remove content that breaks sitewide rules. — Geodude671 (talk | contribs | email)‎ . . 15:50, 7 April 2018 (MDT)

The groups I play with do not have a issue with this class as written, just my feats need to inline with abilities as such; Dual Wield, Keen Mind, Inspiring Leader, as such I can only use 1 sub trait of this class, I use "Marksman".--DominusTempus3 (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2018 (MDT)

I have removed most of the templates, as they have actually been addressed, and the people adding these templates have not even checked, nor come to discuss issues with you further. I do agree, however, that there is a balance issue that may need addressing. There are plenty possible ways to address this - But aside from balance, this class seems well constructed overall, and so is not a viable CfD. --SgtLion (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2018 (MDT)