Template talk:3.5e Races Breadcrumb

Expansion

What are peoples thoughts on this? Whenever I made another breadcrumb tier deep from a page like 3.5e Races or DnD Creatures, etc I always run into the same problem (for me). Should they be named things like [[Template:3.5e Creatures CR 12 Breadcrumb]] or [[Template:3.5e CR 12 Creatures Breadcrumb]]? Your thoughts? --Green Dragon 14:39, 2 August 2009 (MDT)

...uh...what's the problem? --TheWarforgedArtificer 14:42, 2 August 2009 (MDT)

For the expansion onto this breadcrumb should they be 3.5e LA 0 Races Breadcrumb or should they be 3.5e Races LA 0 Breadcrumb? --Green Dragon 14:53, 2 August 2009 (MDT)

3.5e LA 0 Races Breadcrumb looks better to me...(I'm still not sure what this is about). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheWarforgedArtificer (talk • contribs) 14:57, 2 August 2009 (MST). Please sign your posts.

That's the same grammatical idea I used for the creatures (although they are not done). I was just wondering what your, albeit grammatical, thoughts on this issue are. Since breadcrumbs have a grammatical side (that's why they are always plural) they should follow this trend. I think they both work grammatically and, more then anything else, that was what I was wondering. --Green Dragon 15:14, 2 August 2009 (MDT)

the "3.5e Races LA 0 Breadcrumb" doesn't work very well, that one isn't gramatically correct, but the first one, "3.5e LA 0 Races Breadcrumb" is correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheWarforgedArtificer (talk • contribs) 15:20, 2 August 2009 (MST). Please sign your posts.

I agree with that implementation on D&D Wiki in any case (grammatically I mean - or else the Creatures breadcrumb's need to be changed. --Green Dragon 21:54, 13 August 2009 (MDT)