Talk:The Netbook of Feats Rating System

Possible Removal

Discussion moved from User talk:Green Dragon#Netbook of Feat Balance

Nobody even uses this system here, and the system is pretty horrible anyway. Why do we even still have it in our feat templates and on our feat list pages? Surgo 13:00, 13 March 2009 (MDT)

I was about to say the same thing as I'm working through a bit of the feat list as I update things. Is it entirely necessary to include the NBoF rating system in the feat list? Is it something we can ignore? or is it really necessary? -- Sleaker 16:21, 13 March 2009 (MDT)

Yeah, do we really want to remove a rating system (albeit poor) which has a lot of things rated? I mean the system is comparable to our class rating system (albeit one sided since ours goes over and under, and theirs just over), although I am not sure about their implementation (probably like ours... with some classes having a fake rating and others a very fair rating). In any case I think we should either take one of two options. Either remove the entire rating system, and call it good. Or change the rating system to work for all the feats (like the class rating system) and have the NBoF rating only being considered one rating within that rating system. Thoughts? --Green Dragon 05:48, 15 March 2009 (MDT)

That's the thing though...there isn't a lot of things rated on the wiki. Almost nothing is rated with the NBoF system. Surgo 11:32, 15 March 2009 (MDT)

Surgo makes a good point, but unless we come up with a better alternative, I'd still say it is better than no rating system at all. Maybe we should taskforce a few people together to rate all the non-rated feats.   Hooper   talk    contribs    email   11:41, 15 March 2009 (MDT)

I agree that we should just remove the entire NBoF rating system. It would be very messy and possibly impossible to implement as well. --Green Dragon 11:41, 17 March 2009 (MDT)