Talk:Sauromancer (3.5e Class)
From D&D Wiki
Origins[edit]
Like I mentioned earlier, this comes from the game Dominions 3, with some modifications of my own. I have already received permission to use this, as mentioned much earlier in the discussion for the main page. Noname 00:55, 29 December 2007 (MST)
- To see the game's original units, go to http://www.dom3minions.com/~semirand/Dom3UnitReferencev304/00161. and http://www.dom3minions.com/~semirand/Dom3UnitReferencev304/01036. The username is "ball" and the password is "pass1712" This information is freely available on this site:http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/threads/showflat.php?Number=497152 And no, I am not affiliated with Shrapnel Games or Illwinter, nor is this an advertisement of their product. Noname 00:55, 29 December 2007 (MST)
- Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple ("Purple for dyes fetched its weight in silver at Colophon, in Asia.") Noname 23:52, 30 December 2007 (MST)
Status[edit]
This is no longer a stub. Noname 16:11, 1 January 2008 (MST)
- I have removed the template stating this is a stub. As this get a fuller description and becomes better wikified feel free to remove the other two templates. --Green Dragon 19:25, 1 January 2008 (MST)
- Is this wikified now? I have made it conform more to the layout standards, save for the quote. Noname 01:20, 12 March 2008 (MDT)
- Not quite. Compare it to this sample layout (Druid (Evaluational Base Class Layout)). If you need a stencil of sorts to help you along, copy the wiki-markup from the base class preload. Try to make note of your formatting. There seems to be a common misconception that class names are always capitalized within their descriptions. —Sledged (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2008 (MDT)
- A good example class is the Marksman. --Green Dragon 19:59, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
- Is this better? I know it is still incomplete, though. Noname 23:48, 14 March 2008 (MDT)
- Has the article been amended so as to conform with the standards? If not, how can I fix it? Noname 23:58, 29 March 2008 (MDT)
- It looks a lot better. Although this could improve with an example NPC and more information in the class features section. --Green Dragon 17:20, 30 March 2008 (MDT)
Race Restriction[edit]
Base classes should never have race restrictions. That implies a specific role normally reserved for prestige classes. Base classes should be broader. —Sledged (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2008 (MDT)
- Seconded. What you can do instead is in the "Races" section, state that it is more likely for a particular race to become a Sauromancer. Alternatively, you could turn it into a prestige class if the race restriction is really an issue. --Barnacle Ed 10:36, 30 March 2008 (MDT)
- I changed it a bit. Noname 11:14, 30 March 2008 (MDT)