Talk:Ribbon Maiden (3.5e Creature)

Featured Article Nomination

I am nominating this article for featured article status since I feel that, with some work, this is featured article content. It is an interesting idea, comparable to creatures like the Shadow of The Void of a lower level with different methods of accomplishing the same thing, and the image is definitively not a violation. --Green Dragon 22:17, 7 October 2010 (MDT)

Comment — I have not checked the balance, but I doubt it conforms to making creatures. Thoughts on how the balance should be improved? --Green Dragon 22:17, 7 October 2010 (MDT)

Comment — The mechanics are not worded that easily. Thoughts on how wording of the mechanics, and in general, should be improved? --Green Dragon 22:17, 7 October 2010 (MDT)

Comment — Should the deeper related pages be made to conform to FA criteria? --Green Dragon 22:17, 7 October 2010 (MDT)

I am removing the nomination since there is no concensus and it has been nearly a year without improvement. Marasmusine (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2013 (MDT)

Comments on the Class

I believe FA was a bit premature for this creature. First I am pretty sure the ECL is off (fort save vs death at will anyone), the magic weapon minimum for bypassing damage reduction was killed post 3rd edition, and overall the amount of random impressive abilities seems excessive to say the least (a look that does temporary stat damage is obscene since it is a ranged stat drain, not to mention the deflection bonus making it very hard to kill.) Tivanir 08:56, 2 May 2012 (MDT)

Agreed. The idea is interesting, but it's not FA material IMO.-- Irykyl 09:35, 2 May 2012 (MDT)