Talk:Lord of the Damned (3.5e Prestige Class)
From D&D Wiki
Rating[edit]
Power - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because this class makes a good necromancer, and gets lots of little tools to help it as one. → Rith (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2009 (MDT)
Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because everything in this class can be easily understood considering the source material. → Rith (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2009 (MDT)
Formatting - 3/5 I give this class a out of 5 because sizable portions of the preload are missing, though, interwiki linking is effectively comprehensive (though a couple of those red links need to be handled). → Rith (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2009 (MDT)
Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because while there are a good few necromancer classes out there, none of them are as evil as this class is. → Rith (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2009 (MDT)
Rating[edit]
Power - I give this class a 5 out of 5 because its a kick ass Prestige Class that is great for Antagonists>>> --50.35.220.121 00:40, 14 February 2011 (MST)
Wording - I give this class a 2 out of 5 because it could be worded differently to understand it more. --50.35.220.121 00:40, 14 February 2011 (MST)
Formatting - I give it a 4.5 out of 5 because it just needs a few tweaks --50.35.220.121 00:40, 14 February 2011 (MST)
Flavor - I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it has all the flavor you need in a bad guy. --50.35.220.121 00:40, 14 February 2011 (MST)
Rating[edit]
Power - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because it is very overpowered, granting four levels of a template as well as too many abilities for free. Compared to a cleric, you get five feats, four powerful abilities, and the lich template in exchange for... lower fortitude saves. Only removing every other spellcasting level would make it balanced. --71.202.252.30 11:34, 4 April 2011 (MDT)
Rating[edit]
Power - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because it is incredibly overpowered, essentially a cleric with free feats and a weaker fort save. --207.6.227.63 04:46, 31 July 2011 (MDT)
Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the wording is only somewhat odd in a few places. --207.6.227.63 04:46, 31 July 2011 (MDT)
Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the formatting is pretty good. --207.6.227.63 04:46, 31 July 2011 (MDT)
Flavor - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because because while there is some flavour associated with the class, it is barely represented in the class's features and is fairly generic all the same. --207.6.227.63 04:46, 31 July 2011 (MDT)
