Talk:Inquisitor (3.5e Class)
From D&D Wiki
Reverting recent changes to the class[edit]
Oh dear. There have been quite a few edits to this class as of late by Specialist Lion. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, most of the changes are (in my opinion) for the worse: a lot of it is just changing words and phrases, and the additions, omissions and changes to the actual rules rarely make sense (my favorite is "Fortitude Stamina roll of (Inquisitor's Life Data + Inquisitor's Charisma Modifier)"). The formatting has also been made wonky. I think it would make sense to take the page back to how it was after RamZs's fix on 16.08., but I don't know how I would go about doing that - I've tried undoing edits on the History page before, and I've always managed to make a mess of things. Help? Cancelion (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2018 (MDT)
- Find the revision that you wish to restore, and click the date of that revision to view it. Then, click "edit." You should see a warning message that you are editing an out of date version of the page. Without making any changes to the old revision, click "Save." That's how normal users can use the rollback tool :) — Geodude
(talk | contribs | email) . . 13:59, 24 September 2018 (MDT)
Spell progression[edit]
Specialist Lion contacted me by email to discuss this inquisitor's spell progression - I'll be discussing things further here for transparency. You made a lot of good points (I won't be posting the email here), in that a lower progression of spells (á la bard) is ill suited for the class, as it needs to both contribute on an offensive and defensive capability. The inquisitor falls into the jack-of-all-trades category, where it's easy to be a little too poor in all the things you should be doing. Saying that the class is not contributing as much as a cleric is a moot point thought, it being among the best classes in the game :D As much as I love having things neat (and two classes having the same spell progression is neat to me), I'm starting to lean on increasing the spell progression as suggested by SL - what do people think? Cancelion (talk) 01:21, 18 November 2018 (MST)
