Talk:Going Nowhere Fast (3.5e Spell)

Balance

Unlimited range? Isn't that dangerously cheesy? (I like it otherwise btw). -- Eiji 00:24, 8 January 2008 (MST)

definately cheesy ... :( --Othtim 22:57, 16 February 2008 (MST)

I took a chop or seven at this spell. It's been up here for a while, so I figure it is free game (Ping Pong, tell me if it's no good). I think I kept the spirit of the spell while balancing it and cleaning up spelling and the like. -- Eiji 01:14, 17 February 2008 (MST)

Yeah it's okay I suppose, seems a little weak for a L9 spell now, though. --Othtim 01:16, 17 February 2008 (MST)

Aye. Boosted it a bit more and compared to Temporal Stasis, lvl 8, which is technically stronger. So I dropped this to lvl 7. -- Eiji 03:05, 17 February 2008 (MST)

I've not been on for a while, so haven't had a chance to reply. Looking back, I think the wording (and spelling) of the original spell was terrible . The aim of it was to have a spell that limited movement. Upon thinking about it an image came to mind of a beam of light that travelled incredibly slowly, hence a ray that travels at 5ft per turn. Because of the bad wording I think the line "alternatively by touching someone else the efects are past to them" might have been misinterpreted. It meant that by touching someone else you rid yourself of the effects, but pass it on to them. Feel free how ever to edit it in any way you want. --Ping pong ball +3 14:04, 25 September 2008 (MDT)

I am well aware that I am really late to the party, but I really like this spell and my group has used it to good effect in two campaigns, now, but we did so with the alterations that I have just made to the page. I've tried to make the wording more precise, but if anyone is still paying attention to this article, I would like to hear their thoughts on it. - Joker (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)