Talk:Chronoblade (3.5e Class)

Rating

Balance - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because <<<nice balance of combat and skills, could use more skill abilities but would be too op>>>

Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because <<<well worded minus the explanation of power points>>>

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because <<<fun mix with the time lord race and the abilities to mix in time powers and what have you>>>

Quick Question

You forgot to delete preload 174.60.59.67. -70.118.77.26 22:14, 11 July 2013 (MDT)

How is this complete if there is not a power point progression? 67.62.94.195 20:54, 28 February 2014 (MST)

Fixed it. --Green Dragon (talk) 05:04, 5 March 2014 (MST)

Rating

Balance - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because <<<Lacks a honest power point/level, too many abilities>>> --70.118.77.26 22:12, 11 July 2013 (MDT)

Wording - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because <<<It's simply poorly worded, lacks any explanation for why they cannot multiclass, and is just plain in need of editing>>> --70.118.77.26 22:12, 11 July 2013 (MDT)

Formatting - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because <<<Very OP.>>> --70.118.77.26 22:12, 11 July 2013 (MDT)

Flavor - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because <<<Really? Chronoblades? In DND. Le Sigh.>>> --70.118.77.26 22:12, 11 July 2013 (MDT)

Rating

Balance - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because : Force damage overcomes any resistance.Is a mixture of many good classes with none of their weaknesses(monk ac and move,rogue agility,and fighter feats) and on top you get power point maneuvers.Too powerful in my opinion and needs to be balanced. It can only work with high level campaign or greatly customized party.Also the enemy should be at least +3 challenge rating to have a chance of wining 1v1

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because --94.67.99.51 06:03, 7 February 2014 (MST)

Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because:You should ad a section about counters(simply a wizard is not enough because he will get the initiative and will be at melee range at 1rst round provided he has spotted the threat.Even with casting on the defense a wizard or sorcerer is at a disadvantage.Over all I like it.

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because I like the concept and as a homebrew class I know how much potential it has but as a dm its really hard to counter him and make the game fun for all my players.I would want him to be a little more fragile and agile and not that much wisdom of the future based to fit more worlds but i get that this was not your intention when you built it.

Rating

Balance - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because of 6 different reasons: it has the fastest save progression, the fastest BAB progression, the largest hit dice, a ridiculous amounts of abilities (and bonus feats),FORCE WEAPONS, they negate all damage resistance. I should not have to mention the fact that they pretty much have taken all the best things about every other martial class and slammed them into one typhoon of a character.

Wording - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because beyond not sighting how bonus' apply they also fail to mention the gaping flaw that it isn't proficient with its own blades.

Formatting - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because while it is, I suppose, formatted well, due to the scoring system I don't want to bump this thing up to high because it is ungodly broken. I mainly wanted to gripe about how horribly unbalanced this is.

Flavor - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because I'm pretty sure there are some prestige classes that cover this already.