Talk:Atrocity Dragon (3.5e Creature)

CR

First post belongs to the Archangel--Arael 22:49, 22 July 2008 (MDT)

Behold the true incarnation of Sadism!--Arael 22:50, 22 July 2008 (MDT)

A CR3 monster with over 100 hp and a 4d12 breath weapon? Seriouslt? 213.67.205.227 08:52, 1 September 2008 (MDT)

I had a friend fix that problem for me.--Arael 12:18, 2 September 2008 (MDT)

I see the same thing, wyrmling, CR 3... when it's clearly an epic dragon. They're born Large with 12 HD after all. O.o;;; Also, formatted your talk page, use colons to indent. --Eiji 13:57, 2 September 2008 (MDT)

Maybe the "true incarnation of sadism" is the... DM would run this? XD -- Eiji 19:16, 6 October 2008 (MDT)

I agree, the CR's need to be fixed. --Green Dragon 10:41, 7 October 2008 (MDT)

Don't forget, the Dragon is immune to death! --TK-Squared 12:14, 7 October 2008 (MDT)

Also don't forget that its caster level is 3, making it the equivalent in spellcasting of a level 3 sorcerer. That isn't much on itself, but a sorcerer doesn't have other goodies like 12 hit dice, stupidly large numbers, ...... Surgo 10:57, 8 October 2008 (MDT)

fine then, if you all hate it so much let green ddragon or eiji change the CR to something you can all agree upon.--Arael 09:50, 8 October 2008 (MDT)

I didn't aim to make this into a creature that the fighter of the party could walk up to and kill.--Arael 21:10, 8 October 2008 (MDT)

It'll be pretty impossible to kill for a bunch of 3rd level characters whether you say its CR is 3 or 300. Maybe you should look up the meaning of Challenge Rating. Also, you could have just used mine instead of copy it. :p --Sulacu 23:16, 8 October 2008 (MDT)

There there, we don't hate it. It's just not functional as is. Our criticism is a form of love. <3 Anyway, it's not fighters you have to worry about, it's wizards.. but I digress...

I'll leave the dragon as is, and just change the CR. Hmm, now I'm not really a good judge of high CRs so while I know it should be changed, to what... not so sure. I'm glad to take suggestions. Also I notice the CRs have the names doubled twice so I, or whoever, gets to it first can fix that. (Actually on closer look, the advancement list and the list with the stats don't line up.. which is correct Arael?) -- Eiji 23:31, 8 October 2008 (MDT)

sorry, my bad on that Eiji it's the stat increases are correct, if someone can fix the other part I would be grateful; also wizards don't pose a threat that much unless they are relying heavily on touch spells.--Arael 16:59, 9 October 2008 (MDT)