Talk:3.5e Aerial Feats

Sugessions on more?

Anyone have any sugessions on more? --DeadlyNightShade 10:17, 6 August 2006 (MDT)

What is this?

Er... Why are the feats not made? Could someone please explain this to me... --Green Dragon 12:22, 18 August 2006 (MDT)

i don't know why they didn't have aerial feats before. --DeadlyNightShade 23:55, 18 August 2006 (MDT)

No, I mean the actual feat is not on D&D Wiki, the 3.5e Aerial Feats is the only page that describes any of the aerial feats. Is this how it is supposed to be? I am still confused... --Green Dragon 16:17, 19 August 2006 (MDT)

Shade, each feat is supposed to have its own page providing the full discription of the feat (i.e. feat name, [feat type], and "Benefit" at minimum. "Prerequisites", "Normal", and "Special" where applicable). What you have done so far is just put together the summaries. I've created the links, but you need to create the pages (by following the links).

Also, they have done aerial feats before; Flyby Attack, Hover, and Wingover. They just haven't referred to them as such.

Lastly, though it's not enforced with a written rule, the general policy for ability score prerequisites is that they be odd-numbered. So I suggest making the prereqs for Aerial Combat "Str 15, Dex 15". —Sledged 15:17, 26 August 2006 (MDT)

Thanks, that was what I was wondering about. Also I hope these feats exist, and are not just descriptions..... --Green Dragon 18:18, 27 August 2006 (MDT)

X.x sorry I'll get to adding thoses pages about the feats, and also should i add the SRD feats to the list? also i have to change the Aerial combat feat because that is Fly speed, as far as i know you receive no pentalty, some of the feats might disappear also after some more research --DeadlyNightShade 08:05, 31 October 2006 (MST)

The SRD feats should not be added, as these are feats are strictly homebrew. Anyway, I look forward to when these feats are made. --Green Dragon 15:17, 31 October 2006 (MST)

I have no clue what i was talking about with the SRD feats anymore, but how does that look, more like what you were hoping for? --DeadlyNightShade 19:10, 17 June 2007 (MDT)

So...

What're we doing with this page? —Sledged 20:29, 12 September 2006 (MDT)

I was thinking that we should wait for DeadlyNightShade to respond, so I will put the "Message of Interest" thing on his User-talk. --Green Dragon 20:38, 13 September 2006 (MDT)

. . . —Sledged 11:23, 27 October 2006 (MDT)

Posted another "Message of Interest" on this User-talk, lets see what happens... --Green Dragon 11:31, 27 October 2006 (MDT)

sorry i had forgotten to put this page on my watch list X.x --DeadlyNightShade 08:02, 31 October 2006 (MST)

No problem, it is resolved anyway now. --Green Dragon 15:18, 31 October 2006 (MST)

as do I my research is almost done too --DeadlyNightShade 18:51, 10 November 2006 (MST)

. . . —Sledged (talk) 15:41, 2 February 2007 (MST)

Okay, this is getting ridiculous. Would anyone like to take this over and finish these up or should we axe this page? Please give your input. --Green Dragon 14:25, 3 February 2007 (MST)

I say deleted it. It can always be restored later. —Sledged (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2007 (MST)

Are you sure their is not enough content to work from? I feel kind of bad about deleted things people could use. I think we need more opinions here as I know I am biased. --Green Dragon 20:08, 4 February 2007 (MST)

Maybe i'm a little too slow X.x but all i need to know is if you get minuses for fighting well fling? --DeadlyNightShade 11:23, 7 March 2007 (MST)

I don't think so. --Green Dragon 21:06, 7 March 2007 (MST)

Hmm, i haven't been able to find anything on it so i'm just going to change it. --DeadlyNightShade 09:25, 8 March 2007 (MST)

Okay. --Green Dragon 23:05, 12 March 2007 (MDT)