Talk:Vest of Fiery Healing (3.5e Equipment)
From D&D Wiki
Clarification And Cost check[edit]
"Remain in contact with the fire damage source" seems kind of ambigious. Can we get some clarification. Additionally, I was plotting out the costs and I ran it for the minor vest just to make sure I was doing it right and got a different number than you did for the cost. Is the remain in contact statement modifying its cost in some way? --Xenophon 08:09, 6 November 2006 (MST)
- That clarify it for you? --Calidore Chase 02:41, 8 November 2006 (MST)
Coming Changes[edit]
There will be some changes to this item soon as I think it is too powerful after careful reflection. --Calidore Chase
- Changes are done, tell me what you think. --Calidore Chase 05:29, 13 November 2006 (MST)
Deleted[edit]
Why were the two older discussions deleted? --Green Dragon 16:45, 29 November 2006 (MST)
- They were no longer relevant. --Calidore Chase 22:33, 29 November 2006 (MST)
- Blue Dragon hates it when I delete old things as well, as they are still relevant (well, kinda) but they more help see when the article has come from; its history. Do you think the old discussions should be put back on this page? --Green Dragon 22:52, 29 November 2006 (MST)
- If you think others will find it useful or informative, sure. Otherwise, nah. --Calidore Chase 01:31, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- I will put the old discussion on this page again, thanks for you cooperation, and i hope you don't mind too much. --Green Dragon 16:56, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- Doesn't bother me at all. Honestly all I was trying to do was keep the page clean. All happiness on this end as far as DnD wiki is concerned. Especially all the constructive criticism. It is so hard to find good people to discuss this subject with. --Calidore Chase 17:32, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- Just curious... Did you get this impression of "It is so hard to find good people to discuss [Dungeons and Draongs Material]." because of the Wizards boards? I am wondering because I have felt the same way, with people not responding or all the comments are negative... --Green Dragon 18:05, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- I quit going to the wizard boards for creative content a while ago. I still love the site, but do not rely on the posters for anything. --Calidore Chase 18:09, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- Same. --Green Dragon 18:12, 30 November 2006 (MST)
- Course in their defense, the boards are not really the best forum for putting something out there for everyone to see and critique. This wiki, however, is an excellent point for just that. I just hope that if someone does use one of the items I contributed that they at least say how it went. --Calidore Chase 09:06, 1 December 2006 (MST)
- I.. would not expect that. People use the things on D&D Wiki (I have, etc), but because no one asks for a review of how the item went in ther Campaign people do not tell them. I have only seen about 1 comment that said the item "Worked Fine", other than that no one has posted anything. --Green Dragon 15:12, 2 December 2006 (MST)