Talk:Trying it without the feat (3.5e Variant Rule)

Supplemental Variant Rule?

Would you mind explaining your rational for putting this under "Supplemental Variant Rules"? --Green Dragon 21:33, 22 August 2007 (MDT)

Erm, its... supplemental? It supplements the game? --Mkill 07:18, 23 August 2007 (MDT)

According to what has been decided on D&D Wiki → "A supplemental variant rule can be implemented into a campaign with little or no change in the core dynamics. These rules cover an area that the core rules do not cover or do not cover well." whereas → "A transformational variant rule, when implemented into a campaign, will change the core dynamics. These rules change the core rules to make them more playable or more realistic while staying within the d20 framework." I feel that this rule should be classified under the later as it does change the core dynamics, however it changes then to be "more playable or more realistic". What do you think? --Green Dragon 16:15, 26 August 2007 (MDT)

Then go ahead and move it then mister Wiki Admin.--Gruegirl 10:06, 2 October 2007 (MDT)

Name

This name reminds me of a CO, not a rule set. I feel it should be changed... Ideas? --Green Dragon 21:38, 22 August 2007 (MDT)

No, it's definitely a variant rule. --Mkill 07:18, 23 August 2007 (MDT)

I meant that the name should be changed :P. Do you think the name fits? --Green Dragon 16:12, 26 August 2007 (MDT)