Talk:Treant, Specific (3.5e Template)
From D&D Wiki
Powerful Build[edit]
First of all, I hate Powerful Build, just to put it out there and make sure you know I probably have a bias. All the benefits of a size category larger without any of the drawbacks? That's broken, if you ask me.
More to the point, I don't think treants should have it. It means they have a naturally hight muscle tone for their size, and since treants don't have muscles, being tress and all, I don't think it's appropriate. -Valentine the Rogue 17:10, 13 April 2009 (MDT)
- Well, it's fair enough to dislike the quality, seeing as it gives you several benifits while lacking any real drawback. Though, I personally thought that powerful build meant that they were in the gray regions of size, to the point that, should they simply stand there and not do anything, they'd be considered one size category, yet, if they stand tall, reach out, and try and fill up as much space as possible, they'd be considered one size category larger than otherwise. But hey, to each his own. → Rith (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2009 (MDT)
just saying you may want to give ginkgo trees ancient body because ginkgo's have been around as a species longer than many other trees and you also may want to give it gender specific traits because ginkgo trees have genders and only one gender has the odor Ewokdruid 19:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
