Talk:Shadow Blade (3.5e Class)

Balance

If this class is supposed to be as powerful as a gestalt of two ordinary classes, I suppose it's balanced. You really should mention this in big letters near the top of the page, though. --Foxwarrior 19:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

It's not supposed to be a combination class, i just tend to run high powered campaigns and like to kill my players. i designed this to still be paired with something else, my gestalt rules are one homebrew (approved by the DM) and one class from the books, like a paladin, warlock, or something.

--Aidragonus 12:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

So you would take this uber class and pair it with something else? Dude that would be a super-uber-uber character. I wish I could join your Campaign crew. That would be so much fun. Yeehaa! --Jay Freedman 20:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey Jay ya dont live in GA do ya? it's only me and one other guy in my crew. Aidragonus 20:53 ET, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

This class is way too insanely powerful. I've given the character playing this a level adjustment, and it's still not enough. Explain to me why you thought it made sense to give a rogue character more skill points than a rogue, more hit points than a barbarian, sneak attack damage of a rogue AND the ability to teleport everywhere?! Annonymous

Rating

Power - <<<1>>>/5 I give this class a <<<1>>> out of 5 because <<<Domination>>> --192.132.96.2 14:58, 7 March 2011 (MST)

Wording - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --192.132.96.2 14:58, 7 March 2011 (MST)

Formatting - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --192.132.96.2 14:58, 7 March 2011 (MST)

Flavor - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --192.132.96.2 14:58, 7 March 2011 (MST)

No explaination of ratings, nullified. --Ganre (talk) 09:49, 10 September 2012 (MDT)

Rating

Power - <<<3.5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<3,5>>> out of 5 because <<<firstly gratz..excellent work but i believe there are two kind of things that aren't so right..the first i think is the HD d12 , d6 or d8 would be better and the second is the BAB/sneak attack progression..for balance sake i believe the bab should be like rogue's (0,1,2,3,3,4,5,6,6,7) or the sneak attack progression every 3 levels instead of 2 .. But still,i have found many classes more powerful than this in sites and in books .. Gratz again>>>

Wording - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<4.8>>> out of 5 because <<<Check the Quick Draw wording>>>

Formatting - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>>

Flavor - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>>

Fixed formatting on ratings(removed nowiki tags) --Ganre (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2012 (MDT)

No explaination of ratings, nullified. Also, last rating was posted twice, cominging the rating(s). --Ganre (talk) 09:49, 10 September 2012 (MDT)

need to edit wording

in shadow form abilty it should say gains the ability to wrap himself in shadows

just some words missing there

I know its says please dont edit but I fixed it. I didnt think the creator would mind to much