Talk:Phoenix (3.5e Prestige Class)
From D&D Wiki
RockJockey's Response[edit]
This prestige class for arcane mages lacks interesting and fluid mechanics. As of right now, the abilities are too strong. Giving players +5 weapons as part of the kit takes away from player goals. A player can always buy a +5 weapon, try and fill the class ability with something more interesting.
A rough definition of a phoenix would be a mythological bird that has beautiful and bright plumage, has an affinity for fire, and can resurrect itself. Using that definition as a basis for the kit idea, one could think up several ideas to improve the kit's abilities and theme. -Is this a mage class, a melee class or a mixed class? Why? -Depending on whether it is a mage class, a melee class or a mixed class, it has to have appropriate tradeoffs. A melee class has full BAB, good Fort Save, lots of health and abilities that emphasize melee combat. A spellcasting class has half BAB, good WIll Save, low health, and full spellcasting. Currently, the class has not defined, it has full BAB and full spellcasting, something needs to change. -Beautiful plumage= some charisma based abilities, perhaps illusions or suggestions. -fire affinity = when the phoenix uses spells, interesting fire based effects happen. -resurrection is fine as is, except losing 1d4 levels is too much.
- The original design (original author-OA) of the class was a full mix of melee and arcane. He had it set up as very powerful melee and very powerful magic. I reduced the melee benefits, and reduced the spellcasting ability. The original abilities of the flaming katana and the magical armor suggested the OA was leaning towards making a strong melee class with magical assist. The spellcasting I placed in is reduced spells per day for a sorcerer, it is not full spellcasting. The original penalty for resurection was 1d8 levels, I reduced it by half, not also that level loss is limited to phoenix levels only. The 'flavor' of the class, as per the OA was "powerful fire-wielding warrior", his/her words. My take on it was warrior based, with minor spellcasting focued on fire spells.
- However that said, if you want to change the direction of the class feel free. --Elohim (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2014 (MDT)
Thanks for replying =) I may do some changes in the future. Perhaps this would be a good druid class?