Talk:Nephilim of Raziel (5e Race)
From D&D Wiki
BSFM, "This is a tool for the benefit of active contributors and editors, not an excuse to be lazy or sloppy." as said in the template description. I've previously discussed publicly over the discord with other editors, Geo and Blobby namely, and believe that a WIP template that has sat on a page for over 3 months without a single edit is an adequate duration. Do you disagree with this rough approximation? And what exactly is the issue with marking it as incomplete if it hasn't been finished yet? Surely an incomplete is more inviting for collaboration than a WIP sticker? Let me know your thoughts. —ConcealedLight (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2018 (MDT)
- I am an active contributor/editor. The current material is not the work of laziness or sloppiness. {{stub}} says discussion should be placed on the talk page about what is missing, that didn't occur. It was a preference about which template should be on an article. In addition, {{stub}} invites the {{delete}} according to {{WIP}}. I am only trying to use templates to the best of their current descriptions. But, I can move this to a user page if no other user has an issue with that?
- "Hey BSFM, are you going to work on this anymore?" would be kind reminder to someone who has a lot going and let a page fall to lesser priority. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 06:49, 12 August 2018 (MDT)
- Ok, I'll keep that in mind as you have done for me. —ConcealedLight (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2018 (MDT)
- Thanks a lot, and I apologize for the slowness of this. This might be the push I needed to "get'r done". BigShotFancyMan (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2018 (MDT)
- Ok, I'll keep that in mind as you have done for me. —ConcealedLight (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2018 (MDT)
Undone Edits[edit]
Here I've undone edits because they don't have wings and it would upset the balance. Thanks. ~ BigShotFancyMan 06:48, 18 June 2019 (MDT)
Note about names[edit]
What was wrong with the note? Based on source material it is part of your naming. Provides examples of what not to do. ~BigShotFancyMan talk 11:58, 19 August 2019 (MDT)
- Seem obvious and stated so there was no point putting it if you'd like to rewrite to gish with the rest of the writing as it would be in the book. —ConcealedLight (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2019 (MDT)
- I don’t want to rewrite it. I want it how it was, hence the way it was written. I don’t think there is anything there stating what not to do. ~BigShotFancyMan talk 15:21, 19 August 2019 (MDT)
- And thus we reach an impasse, I will rewrite it then so it actually works with the page. Thanks for the prompt. —ConcealedLight (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2019 (MDT)
- I don’t want to rewrite it. I want it how it was, hence the way it was written. I don’t think there is anything there stating what not to do. ~BigShotFancyMan talk 15:21, 19 August 2019 (MDT)
- please don't push your own personal agenda. ~BigShotFancyMan talk 23:31, 22 August 2019 (MDT)
- What agenda is that? —ConcealedLight (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2019 (MDT)
- please don't push your own personal agenda. ~BigShotFancyMan talk 23:31, 22 August 2019 (MDT)