Talk:Mageknight (3.5e Class)

I apologize for all the edits, I'm still trying to get used to the formating ^_^' --Holdonstrongly 01:46, 21 July 2008 (MDT)

Not playable

The class isn't really good enough to be playable. He only gets 5 levels of spells, and nothing else that's good enough to make up for that. I guess being able to swing a sword is okay for the first few levels, but after that it's really not and he just falls behind. Not to mention a cleric can swing a sword better than the mageknight can anyway. Surgo 14:11, 20 November 2008 (MST)

Touch up

i'm thinking of changing this class a bit but would like either the creator's or Green Dragon approval--Stryker-Fyre 10:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Rating

Power - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<This class allowed my character to fulfill any role in combat, without overshadowing the classes that were specifically built to be a particular role. Additionally, the Mageknight is capable of fulfilling the party's need for a wizard until level 6 and higher spells are needed, which gives it its own place in combat as well. I particularly liked the addition of the cure spells and the Size-Up ability.>>> --173.245.50.92 10:08, 26 July 2011 (MDT)

Wording - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<Assuming I am reading this section right, wording was done very well, there were no entries I didn't understand when I read them.>>> --173.245.50.92 10:08, 26 July 2011 (MDT)

Formatting - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<Assuming this section is asking how well this class adhered to the layout, I give it a 5, if not, please disregard this vote and I appologize for the confusion, this is the first class I've rated.>>> --173.245.50.92 10:08, 26 July 2011 (MDT)

Flavor - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<Again, I liked how this class could slip into any role in the party, without overshadowing. It made the roleplaying aspect a lot easier.>>> --173.245.50.92 10:08, 26 July 2011 (MDT)

Rating

Power - 4.5/5 I give this class a 4.5 out of 5 because by itself it can't quite stand up on its own. But as it said it works exceedingly well multi-classing with say a rogue --GigaBig (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2013 (MST)

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because reads easily, and everything is explained well.--GigaBig (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2013 (MST)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because Again easy to read and understand. The contents at the top of the article break everything so u can jump right to what u want. --GigaBig (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2013 (MST)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because I really like it as a multi-class aspect but even as its own class it is a great way to cover several fronts in a party healer, spell caster, and fighter without giving the Mageknight too much power. --GigaBig (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2013 (MST)