Talk:Initiate of Compassion (3.5e Feat)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Confusion[edit]
Here, it is witten Non chaotic but on this page, it is written LG or NG. Which one is correct?
(this is my very first comment here)
David Latapie (✒ | @) 10:39, 18 March 2007 (MDT)
- This page is correct. All the source pages have precedence over the feat tables. I fixed the confusion, and sorry about that. --Green Dragon 23:20, 19 March 2007 (MDT)
- Ideally, the shall be relationships between the entries. Like
- General table has {{align-copy}}
- Feat Entry has a {{align}}
- One enters the right value in {{align}} and it is transcluded in the general table corresponding entry.
- This could be applied to other things as well. Although complex, take a look at the French wiktionary (The English one does not do this — example with arbre). Granted, this is a lot of work, but bringing relationship to this encyclopedia would be great!
David Latapie (✒ | @) 07:36, 20 March 2007 (MDT)
- Ideally, the shall be relationships between the entries. Like
- What would be better would be to have the entire feat's prerequisites transfered from its page to the corresponding category. So, what you are referring to is being done on D&D Wiki - however with more gusto. Blue Dragon, with some code from Sledged, made an extension, DPL2CU with its partner DLPCU. This extension does the same thing as {{PAGENAME}} however without the <noincludes> and </noincludes> needed. It's work can be seen on DnD Classes and DnD NPCs. Ths should be included into DnD Feats however a lot of work is needed for that to happen. If you want to help begin with adding good dlpc headers to pages go ahead however I would like to warn you it will be a lot of work. --Green Dragon 21:23, 20 March 2007 (MDT)
- Time is something I am (and will be for the foreseeable future) be in short supply of. Sorry :( and thank you for the interesting explanations. I see that proficient mediawikists are out there :-)
David Latapie (✒ | @) 21:35, 20 March 2007 (MDT)
- Time is something I am (and will be for the foreseeable future) be in short supply of. Sorry :( and thank you for the interesting explanations. I see that proficient mediawikists are out there :-)
- I am glad to have helped. --Green Dragon 21:46, 20 March 2007 (MDT)