Talk:Free-Runner (3.5e Class)

==Talk==
Problems Solved

==Ratings==
Problems Solved

If you want it, anyway..

I was just wondering if you would be offended or me solving grammatical or spelling issues with this article? As far as I'm aware, I'm good at what I do, but I would hate to displease anyone with my actions. I'm just offering my assistance. --SgtLion 01:10, 20 November 2009 (MST)

Not at all

Base Attack

It seems a bit debilitating to give a melee class poor base attack. Wouldn't it be more fitting to match it with that of a Rogue instead of dropping it to Wizard base attack with no spell casting or really any other combat options? Such low base attack will force them to rely on magic weapons with the energy effect in order to deal with heavily armored targets. Those who want to utilize combat expertise will find themselves in an even tighter spot. --Oddplume 13:01, 23 November 2009 (MST)

revising the picture

i was thinking when i was reading the class, and it ocured to me if the d/d magazine still had it whole shin-didg going that this is just a (good) fan made picture away from being a real class down on paper in one of them things! just sayin.--Typ(tip) 03:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Rating

Power - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it has skills for both fighting and surviving, and also allows characters to have a thief type char. without having a thief. --Vaalor 13:55, 12 December 2009 (MST)

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because to my eye everything is spelt correctly and the choic of wording adds flavor. --Vaalor 13:55, 12 December 2009 (MST)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it utilizes tables, breadcrumb, and picture, i like it. --Vaalor 13:55, 12 December 2009 (MST)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because a character like this can add alot of diversity to a plain campaign and will be able to be used for a mass amount of good or evil, again i like it. --Vaalor 13:55, 12 December 2009 (MST)

Comments

Still using the Assassins Creed picture and still has a 20/20 rating. *Sigh*. And, they still ask me why I left this site... --Jay Freedman 07:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Who was the last person to change it from when it had no picture and still used the free runner ranking? Would it be possible if anyone still has the description that was used then could they send it to me? Oh and on a side note. Whoever changed it messed it up... they left references to the minds wrath ability and it no longer has a description and there is a slip up on the sneak attack on the run ability in the ability description it has the wrong numbers when compared to the table. --Pandemis 09:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

check the history--Name Violation 05:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Forgetful much?

Where is the explanation for mind's wrath?--Artix Von Kreiger (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2013 (MST)

Rating

Balance - 5/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because --75.100.155.11 03:56, 19 December 2014 (MST)Sneak attack on the run is a nice fit but I feel given he isnt just sneaky it could be made a first level attack minus sneaking

Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because --75.100.155.11 03:56, 19 December 2014 (MST) One item that was listed for character feats was not explained. If this is looked at often enough I am sure that can be fixed.

Formatting - X/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because --75.100.155.11 03:56, 19 December 2014 (MST)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a X out of 5 because --75.100.155.11 03:56, 19 December 2014 (MST)

Rating

Balance - 3.5/5 I give this class a 3.5 out of 5 because it is not entirely overpowered, but this class seems on base more powerful than the other classes at the same level

Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because it needed my intervention for some spelling consistency errors which made it difficult to level up

Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because I can't pinpoint why, but this class seems sloppy somehow. It seems like it isn't quite finished and I feel somewhat confused despite its being standard in layout

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because despite some really silly namedrops which I assume are for a campaign that I was not a part of, the class itself has good potential, plus assasin's creed to build off of