Talk:Engineer (5e Background)
Could whoever started this background finish it, please? I kinda like the idea of an engineer background. --Redrum 17:33, 19 October 2016 (MDT)
- You know, Redrum, you could always just adopt the page and finish it yourself if you appreciate the idea! The OC is clearly not planning on finishing it. --Kydo (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2016 (MST)
What is a treemancer?--209.97.85.48 13:15, 29 October 2016 (MDT)
Skill Proficiencies[edit]
I didn't think of the Investigation skill but it's a good idea. About the other one, I would go with Arcana, Nature, and (maybe) Medicine because they are "scientific". I would leave History as a class skill option. --Redrum 17:53, 25 January 2017 (MST)
Does anyone have any problems with Genetic Engineering. --Redrum 18:50, 21 March 2018 (MDT)
Tool Proficiencies[edit]
Has anyone have any opinions on architect's tools? --Redrum 23:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone have any opinions on a Demolition Kit? --Redrum 18:51, 18 October 2017 (MDT)
Does anyone have any opinions on Plumber's tool's? --Redrum 13:41, 4 November 2017 (MDT)
Alternate background[edit]
Would it be possible to merge aspects of this background with the noble background to make a Technocrat background? --Redrum 17:17, 12 July 2017 (MDT)
Clockwork Constructs[edit]
Would the builders of Clockwork Constructs use this background or would I need to create a new Background? --Redrum 13:37, 25 November 2017 (MST)