Talk:Arctic Augurer (3.5e Prestige Class)
Rating[edit]
Power - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --70.242.25.24 20:00, 26 March 2009 (MDT)
Wording - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --70.242.25.24 20:00, 26 March 2009 (MDT)
Formatting - <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>>/5 I give this class a <<<Insert Your Rating Here>>> out of 5 because <<<insert why you gave the rating and how to improve it>>> --70.242.25.24 20:00, 26 March 2009 (MDT)
Flavor - <<<5>>>/5 I give this class a <<<5>>> out of 5 because <<<it's dangerously cheesy.>>> --70.242.25.24 20:00, 26 March 2009 (MDT)
Artic[edit]
ArCtic. -Valentine the Rogue 22:08, 26 March 2009 (MDT)
Rating[edit]
Power - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because it is not particularly over powered, perhaps more of a limitation on the automatic stilling and silencing of spells(may to spells with the ice descripter?). Also, consider what is going to happen if a PC has this on, anything near him not immune to cold is goig to get hit with a short sword of slowing EVERY ROUND, perhaps they need the ability to supress this at will, but generally well balanced. --Ganre 08:50, 27 March 2009 (MDT)
Wording - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because the misspelling of the title and several words hurt you here. Also, the wording of silent sleet and still crystals is a bit unclear. --Ganre 08:50, 27 March 2009 (MDT)
Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because it is formatted pretty well, but could be linked better. --Ganre 08:50, 27 March 2009 (MDT)
Flavor - 3.5/5 I give this class a 3.5 out of 5 because it is pretty much a specialty class, and will have trouble intergrating into quite a few games. It's certainly not a unique idea, but it is a well thought out one. --Ganre 08:50, 27 March 2009 (MDT)