Talk:Arcane Librarian (3.5e Class)

Rating

Power - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because limited to what scroll the Arcane Librarian stumbles upon, which can be a lot, or not. It seems balanced enough. --AnimeOtaku137 19:47, 17 January 2011 (MST)

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it reads very well and is easily comprehended. --AnimeOtaku137 19:47, 17 January 2011 (MST)

Formatting - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because it is missing many components. --AnimeOtaku137 19:47, 17 January 2011 (MST)

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because the class is very minimalistic, but it's simplicity doesn't necessarily detract from it. --AnimeOtaku137 19:47, 17 January 2011 (MST)

Rating

Balance - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because having not used this class in a setting yet, I can only guess at the relative balance of the class from reading. Having to deal with a caster capable of using either divine or arcane magic can be problematic, and even somewhat not enjoyable for other players. However, the idea is interesting, so I suppose there's some merit to it.

Wording - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because the class is poorly described in how the scroll system works. It seems to imply that the scrolls are treated as activated when the Librarian uses said spell, and would be lost after that. So unless the Librarian is willing to be very thrifty with spells, or the DM is willing to toss scrolls at them all day, it seems to be a very lackluster setup.

Formatting - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because it's a webpage. It has most of the information I am looking for, but not everything.

Flavor - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because I like the idea behind a caster reliant on scrolls rather than just magically gaining knowledge of the spells she/he should know.