Talk:Valiant (5e Feat)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
— This article became a quality article! BigShotFancyMan 08:17, 12 March 2019 (MDT)Potential QA[edit]
I think this feat has benefits that are flavorful to its title, and conditions on the benefits make for fair gameplay. I nominate it to be a Quality Article. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 11:03, 11 May 2018 (MDT)
- Support Per Above, I think this would be a Quality Article. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 11:04, 11 May 2018 (MDT)
- Comment - While I agree that this is a nice page it is clearly a bit stronger than a +2 bonus and has benefits that overlap with class features/ racial traits. Instead of the second benefit, perhaps something like "if you pass your save against the effect then your allies have advantage as well" maybe against the same effect like a dragons Fearful Presence or a 1-minute benefit. Another option for the third option, (as I feel an uncomfortable with the flat bonus too AC) is that if a creature misses you their next attack against you has disadvantage. —ConcealedLight
(talk) 12:54, 15 January 2019 (MST)
- I think your idea for the second option is more flavorful and good. Regarding that bonus to AC, I think +2 is good. How about a +1 instead or playing with your idea, gain advantage when they miss? ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2019 (MST)
- Given this is a feat able to be taken by anyone, I'd still shy away from any kind of AC so playing with the latter option would be preferable. Hopefully I'll get some time to work on some individual pages in the next few days. —ConcealedLight (talk) 19:25, 21 January 2019 (MST)
- Given this is a feat able to be taken by anyone, I'd still shy away from any kind of AC so playing with the latter option would be preferable. Hopefully I'll get some time to work on some individual pages in the next few days. —ConcealedLight
- Fair dos. ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2019 (MST)
- I am good with the feat as it stands after CL's edit. Until someone disagrees, or the opposes the QA extension, I'll leave it be and posssssib-bly passssss it? We'll see. ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2019 (MST)
QA Extension[edit]
Since another user shown interesting in helping, I'd like to extend the process till the end of February. If anyone opposes, I understand and will fail the nominee myself! Thanks :-) ~ BigShotFancyMan (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2019 (MST)
- Seems fine in this case. —ConcealedLight (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2019 (MST)